Verses related to divine attributes are considered to be verses that are related to the news attributes of God on the one hand and to similar verses on the other. This issue has led to the emergence of various debates and sects among Muslims. Given the unifying approach of the manifest religion of Islam, it is essential that such challenging issues be examined.The present study, using a descriptive analytical method and a developmental approach, has explored and applied this issue in the two interpretations of Al-Mizan and Al-Manar. The findings of the study indicate that: Rashid Reza is generally in the category of Ash'arite zahirists who are inclined to the sifaatiyah mufashidah. However, due to his special attention to reason, he is more rational than his fellow thinkers. He strongly criticizes interpretation and metaphysics. In the verses of attributes, he resorts to appearances wherever possible, without being inconsistent with his philosophical principles. Sometimes he interprets through the context of the verse, and finally, in more difficult cases where there is no parallel, by using literary devices in the word. However, Allameh Tabataba'i does not like the statement that literary devices are sometimes used. He is not an externalist, but he believes that he has never interpreted a verse contrary to its apparent meaning. He believes that not only can similar verses, including verses on attributes, be interpreted (express the true truth). But also firm verses can be interpreted, that is, they have a meaning. He sometimes achieves this truth and meaning through the context of the verse In verses where the two interpretations are close to each other, Allamah offers a stronger philosophical explanation. Due to their rationalism, both commentators largely followed the Ahl al-Bayt in theoretical foundations, rejecting the embodiment of attributes in verses and considering interpretation to be the truth of the text